Throwback Thursday: Come home! Rome calls out to her daughters

Welcome to this week’s “Throwback Thursday” installment. Today, we’re going to revisit a post that was originally published back on May 17, 2017 and has been revised.

capture30

Catholics and Protestants: What We Can Learn From Each Other
By Peter Kreeft
Ignatius Press, 2017, 204 pages

1 Star

Peter Kreeft is one of Roman Catholicism’s most prolific apologists. When the new, young pastor of the Southern Baptist church we used to attend several years ago cited Kreeft from the pulpit as his favorite philosopher, I knew it was time for us to leave.

In this new book, Kreeft makes an appeal in simple, everyday language to non-academic evangelicals to unite with Rome. In Catholic parlance, “unity” always means returning to the authority of the Vatican and to the Catholic sacraments and liturgical worship.

Right off the bat, Kreeft contends that the Reformation’s main debate over the issue of justification was resolved with the 1999 “Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification” between Rome and the liberal Lutheran World Federation, so therefore evangelicals have no good reason for remaining outside of Catholicism. Not so fast, Professor! Mainline liberal Lutherans and Methodists may have signed this purposely ambiguous accord, but Catholicism still teaches the same false gospel of salvation by sacramental grace and merit that it taught in 1517. Nothing has changed. Catholicism teaches good works/sanctification merit justification/salvation. In contrast, Bible Christianity teaches good works/sanctification are the fruit of genuine justification/salvation through faith in Christ alone. The two approaches are diametrically opposed. For an excellent evangelical response to the Joint Declaration, see here.

After quickly dismissing the rhubarb over justification as yesterday’s news, Kreeft then looks at a few other Protestant objections to Catholicism including the “real presence” of Jesus in the eucharist and Mary’s role in salvation. Regarding the former, he simply advises Protestants to visit the nearest Catholic church and pray to the Jesus wafer in the tabernacle and ask if it’s really Him or not. For the latter, he uses the typical Catholic sophistry that all of the veneration/worship accorded to Mary is, at the bottom line, actually devotion to Jesus.

Kreeft strongly compliments evangelicals for their passion for Christ and roundly criticizes cultural Catholics for their apathy and begs evangelicals to return to Rome because the only proper place for the “flame” is the “authentic fireplace.” Kreeft drops the names of Rome-friendly ecumenist, C.S. Lewis, and Mother Teresa throughout the text because he’s certainly aware these two religious celebrities are highly recognizable to undiscerning, doctrine-lite evangelicals and are possible bridges to interest in Rome.

Kreeft gently chides Protestants for basing their identity on a negative, i.e., “protesting” Catholicism, rather than joining Catholics and positively proclaiming the (g)ospel. He also defends Rome’s unscriptural interfaith approach to non-Christian religions, repeating the Vatican line that goodness and truth can be found in all faiths and that they can be Christ-sanctioned paths to redemption.

There’s no logical flow to this book; each short chapter encompasses an individual thought about Catholic-Protestant reunion so you can put it down and pick it up two days later without missing a falsity…er…I mean, a beat. This book is aimed at “Protestants” who have scanty knowledge of Catholic theology and church history and are eager to embrace every person as a fellow Christian who says they “love Jesus too” (à la Rick Warren). Please note that prominent evangelicals, Timothy George (always a Judas cheerleader for Catholicism) and Eric Metaxas, contribute glowing recommendations on the back cover. There’s already plenty of accommodation, cooperation, compromise, and betrayal within evangelicalism. With this book, Kreeft is hoping many will take the next “logical” step.

Be on guard for the genuine Gospel of grace, my brothers and sisters in Christ! False teachers come knocking at the front door and via enticing books.

Postscript: To read how Bible Christians came to be called “Protestants,” see here.

Postscript II: Imagine Spurgeon or Lloyd-Jones’s response if someone asked them what they could learn from Catholicism?

Note from 2023: See here for the index to my serial examination of Kreeft’s book, “Forty Reasons I am a Catholic.”

21 thoughts on “Throwback Thursday: Come home! Rome calls out to her daughters

  1. I’ve heard of Kreeft. I appreciate and acknowledge the things we agree on morally with Catholics, but no more than Mormons or Jehovah’s Witnesses, Jews, or other faiths. It doesn’t mean we should act care-bear about our theological differences like it’s some cute thing. Do you know John Michael Talbot? I believe he’s done such a thing. He seems like a nice guy, but I wasn’t pleased by the hidden teachings which are only disclosed when you begin prodding the members of his monastic community about why they refuse to let Protestants take communion if they don’t go to hell. The kind nun who answered their phone line (that I spoke to several times) told me not to listen to what Catholics were saying in that Protestants are damned, but when challenged on why we need to be members of their church, she paused and had no idea. Then she put me on the phone with one of the brothers of the community and he said they DO believe in the whole “if you find out it’s the true church and don’t join then you could go to hell” thing. And despite all the time she’s been there, she never heard of it, and she must’ve been a member for several years. John also doesn’t talk about it on his program, and neither do the people who work there most of the time. He would be on TBN laughing and joking, saying “What matters is that you have a relationship with Jesus!”

    Like

    1. Yup, I’ve heard of John Michael Talbot. The other priest on TBN is Cedric Pisegna. For them it’s all an ecumenically vague “What matters is that you have a relationship with Jesus!” along with the qualifier that the BEST way is through the RCC.

      Like

      1. I emailed Pisegna before. He said I didn’t need to worry about whether I was a member of the RCC or not, since I was fine spiritually where I was. He didn’t even suggest to me that it was the best way, either. Fair enough. But I do wish these men would find their way to the truth. There certainly are some Catholics who might be saved or are on that path who don’t really believe in all of this stuff–and they usually leave the church once they realize that. I’ve heard stories of some Catholics who followed Protestant conventions and caused concern among rad-trad Priests for teaching people to read their bible, focus on Jesus over Mary, etc. but I find it hard to believe a genuinely saved person can remain in it while truly knowing what their church teaches. I think both of us agree with that! But there are testimonies of these kinds of ‘Catholics’ having a wake-up call and leaving their church for one that teaches the authentic gospel. That’s what made the priests scared–because they were learning about the truth!

        Liked by 1 person

      2. Thanks for the comments. After I accepted Christ as Savior I wrote my former Catholic parish priest a letter about why I left RC-ism and why he should trust in Christ and leave RC-ism, too. He wrote me back saying the Holy Spirit moves as He wills (as in my case) and let it go at that.

        Like

  2. Kreeft is wildly annoying and insufferable. Broussard while lost as can be and a Bible twister at least he isn’t appealing to tradition, flying buttresses and all things that are man made. Yes Broussard is defending a man made and man centered works based righteousness but Kreeft on the other hand does know better. I give you credit for dealing with Kreeft. I am so thankful that Jesus Christ through His Holy Spirit has called me to Himself to the glory of God the Father. May Catholics hear the appeal of the Triune God calling to them to leave Romanism and come to the true faith.

    Liked by 3 people

    1. Thanks for your good comments, Mandy! While Kreeft used humanistic philosophy and sentimentality to appeal to the reader in his “Forty Reasons…” book, Broussard attempts to use Scripture. That said, both fully embrace the RCC’s foundational constructs of the Nature-Grace Interdependence and the Christ-Church Interconnection.
      Kreeft is a challenge. His worldly religious philosophizing definitely appeals to the unregenerated person.
      Yes, praise God for opening our eyes to His Good News of salvation by God’s grace alone, through faith alone, in Jesus Christ alone!

      Liked by 3 people

    1. Well, I don’t remember exactly when we got the internet, but I’m always a foot-dragger when it comes to tech so it was probably a year after everybody else on the street got it.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. I saw first it was one star for your review and I was shock…until I saw who the author was and what the book is called. Yeah this is a one star…when you said there was no logical flow I chuckle since I often do think Kreeft’s apologetics skills is somewhat overrated. I don’t understand how some Protestants are enamored with him

    Liked by 1 person

  4. The first paragraph already had me shaking my head. How does a Baptist pastor get away with quoting someone like Kreeft. A youth pastor in a church we attended years ago told me that some truth can be found in all faiths. I was perplexed. Why would he say something like that. Now I understand. I don’t think I would have the patience to read Kreeft’s book, but then again I’ve also read material and listened to many a sermon for the purpose of discernment. It can be very frustrating though. Great post, Tom!

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Thanks, Cathy. Yup, a Baptist pastor extolling an enemy of the Gospel to his congregation was beyond disconcerting, but it’s par for the course in today’s “evangelicalism.”

      Liked by 2 people

    1. Thanks! I’ve read two of Kreefts books, this one and “Forty Reasons I Am a Catholic,” which I “debated” reason by reason for forty weeks. It’s difficult for me to understand why many evangelicals are so deferential to RC-ism when Catholic apologists like Kreeft write books like this one disparaging the genuine Gospel of grace and encouraging unwary/undiscerning evangelicals to join the salvation-by-merit hamster wheel.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment