First there was Watergate, now there’s Sheengate!

Time for a pop quiz. You have ten seconds. Name a Roman Catholic cleric besides the pope. Give up? Probably 95% of American non-Catholics would not be able to answer that question. But back in the 1950s and 60s, the majority of Americans knew the name of Fulton J. Sheen. The Catholic archbishop had two television shows, Life is Worth Living (1952-1957) on the DuMont Network and the syndicated The Fulton J. Sheen Program (1961-1968). On both shows, the foppishly-attired Sheen grinningly gave out “advice for living” as he propagated the Roman church’s false gospel of salvation by sacramental grace and merit. He actually won two Emmy awards for Most Outstanding Television Personality.

Above: Fulton J. Sheen sells Catholicism on his 1950s television show

In the late 1950s, Sheen became entangled in a feud with his boss, cardinal Francis Spellman of New York City. The cardinal bided his time and in 1966 appointed (aka demoted) Sheen to the bishopric of humble Rochester, New York, where I write from. Sheen resigned in 1969 and died ten years later. The RCC fast-tracks famous Catholics for “sainthood” in an attempt to leverage their celebrity. The effort to canonize Sheen began immediately after his death, but was sidetracked by some Catholic internecine squabbling. Both the dioceses of New York City and Peoria, Illinois (under the sponsorship of Sheen’s niece), Sheen’s birthplace, claimed the future saint’s cadaver and the legal tug-of-war dragged on in the courts for five years (2014-2019). Sheen’s remains were eventually awarded to Peoria and canonization appeared imminent. But the Rochester diocese was simultaneously embroiled in its own legal tug-of-war with the survivors of priest sexual abuse and diocesan cover-up. Some of the legal research seemed to implicate former-bishop Sheen in the cover-up. What did Sheen know and when did he know it? In December 2019, Rochester bishop, Salvatore Matano, sent a message to the Vatican advising them to put the brakes on Sheen’s canonization pending clarification of his role in the alleged cover-up/s. It wouldn’t be good public relations for a canonized saint to be subsequently outed as an abuse enabler.

It’s been almost two years and Catholic officials in Peoria are still waiting impatiently for Sheen’s canonization to be given the green light (see article below). Around 300 people per week make the pilgrimage to Peoria to visit Sheen’s crypt seeking his intercession (photo above) and that number would skyrocket if Sheen were declared a saint.

What’s a Christian to make of this? The Bible declares that everyone who accepts Jesus Christ as their Savior by faith alone is a saint (Greek: hágios, “set apart”). Nowhere in the Bible do we find the Catholic notion of saints being super-holy people. This heterodox notion of super-sanctified people attaining Heaven by their merits is part and parcel of the Catholic salvation system of sacramental grace and merit. Neither in the Bible do we find the Catholic notion of praying to saints as intercessory mediators. That’s an anti-Biblical, blasphemous concept. The RCC’s cavalcade of patron saints is an unabashed plagiarism of pagan Rome’s pantheon of patron gods. See here.

Sheen may or may not be implicated in abuse cover-up. However, two years of silence is a long time, especially given that Sheen’s canonization is certainly at the top of the USCCB’s wish list. But the fact is that hundreds of American Catholic bishops systematically transferred predatory priests from parish to parish, knowingly endangering Catholic children. It was deemed that children were an acceptable sacrifice in maintaining the reputation of the church.

Vatican still silent about why Fulton Sheen sainthood effort delayed

Postscript: Ecumenist Billy Graham was a friend and outspoken admirer of false-gospel promulgator, Fulton J. Sheen.

10 thoughts on “First there was Watergate, now there’s Sheengate!

    1. Thanks, Bruce. I remember watching several episodes as a child. Yes, he was quite a performer with that robe and his theatrical/affected mannerisms. I also remember those very deeply-set eyes. Thanks and blessings to you!


  1. Thanks for this post Tom. I remember Sheen. I find the photo of him in that outfit creepy. But what really disturbed me was your postscript… “Ecumenist Billy Graham was a friend and outspoken admirer of false-gospel promulgator, Fulton J. Sheen.” It’s still disturbing to read that even though I’m very familiar with Graham’s compromise with Rome. Why are pastors so enamored with the Grahams (father and son) and consider it a great honor to be associated with them. It is a great hindrance to those of us who are witnessing to our Catholic families.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks, Cathy. I removed a concluding paragraph that I had written about Sheen’s appearance – his foppish attire, his effete/affected gestures/mannerisms. I didn’t know a lot about life when I watched Sheen as a young child, but I instinctively knew he was unlike the men I knew in my family and in our neighborhood, if you catch my drift.

      Yes, evangelicals are shocked and repulsed by any criticism of Graham. They have no understanding of why we would be critical of the man who leapfrogged irreconcilable doctrinal differences and blazed the ecumenical trail to Rome.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Another Catholic potential saint that turn out to be less than saintly; how horrible that he’s involved with cover up; this is someone that is famous enough that I have actually heard of him. Crazy that there’s that many visitors each week and he’s not even a saint yet. So unbiblical, so sad…

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks, brother. Yes, all of this is unbiblical and sad. The prolongation of Sheen’s canonization due to the legal fight over his corpse and the investigation into his enablement and cover-up of abuse is an exposé of the fraudulence of the canonization process and RC-ism in general. I appreciate that you “get” the craziness of credulous Catholics making the pilgrimage to Peoria to “pray” to Sheen at his crypt. Many evangelical pastors would consider it “bad form” and divisive to criticize that.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s