Kazan Redux: Elia Kazan’s Thirteenth Film: “A Face in the Crowd”

Today, as part of our “Kazan Redux” series, we’re going to re-review director Elia Kazan’s thirteenth film, “A Face in the Crowd.” The review below was first posted on June 6, 2017 and has been slightly revised.

capture30

A Face in the Crowd
Directed by Elia Kazan and featuring Andy Griffith, Patricia Neal, Walter Matthau, Anthony Franciosa, and Lee Remick
Warner Brothers, 1957, 125 minutes

4 Stars

Director Elia Kazan and writer Bud Schulberg had had a huge success with “On the Waterfront” in 1954 and teamed up one more time for this quirky and amazingly prescient movie.

Plot

A radio show producer, Marcia Jeffries (Patricia Neal), discovers a talented drifter, Larry Rhodes (Andy Griffith), in a small-town, Arkansas jail, and presents him with the moniker, “Lonesome.” Rhodes is given a slot on a local radio station and his folksy, irreverent humor is so popular he’s soon invited to host a Memphis television program. Although Rhodes infuriates the show’s sponsor, his audience loves him. A wheeler-dealer office gopher, Joey DePalma (Tony Franciosa), sets himself up as an agent and brokers a deal on behalf of Rhodes for a nationally televised show broadcast from New York City. Predictably, Rhodes’ soaring popularity and influence goes to his head. He’s rude to his staff and dumps fiancé Marcia for a 17-year-old baton twirler, Betty Lou Fleckum, (Lee Remick). Rhodes’ politically-conservative sponsor soon has him playing kingmaker by having him stump for right-wing U.S. Senator, Worthington Fuller, for President. Staff writer, Mel Miller (Walter Matthau), attempts to turn Marcia against Rhodes, but she’s already souring on her discovery. When Rhodes candidly berates his viewership during the closing credits of his show, Marcia, unbeknownst to him, manipulates the sound board, purposely broadcasting his insults over the airwaves. His audience and sponsors abandon Rhodes overnight. When no one shows up at his gathering for conservative politicians and corporate big wigs, Rhodes calls Marcia threatening suicide. She goes to Rhodes’ penthouse to reveal she was the one who betrayed him. The movie ends with Rhodes screaming for Marica to come back as she rides away in a taxi cab.

Comments

Andy Griffith is an absolute hoot in his film debut. Few people saw this, his finest performance, but Griffith would find his audience three years later on “The Andy Griffith Show” (1960-1968) on television, playing a character quite unlike Lonesome Rhodes. Patricia Neal gives a great performance. The film did poor box office, which is understandable given the protagonist is an unlovable monster. There’s no doubt the movie was ahead of its time as Bud Schulberg’s script eerily foretold the role of television in politics. Sources reveal the character of Rhodes was inspired in part by homespun heroes, Arthur Godfrey and Will Rogers.

“A Face in the Crowd” has some wonderful scenes and some great performances, but it’s not quite a five-star movie. Schulberg and Kazan over-reached the mark with this undisguised left-wing, preachy, soapbox. One gets the feeling that with “A Face in the Crowd,” Schulberg and Kazan were saying, “Sure, we may have named names before HUAC, but see, we’re still good liberals!”

Ted Turner’s Turner Movie Classics (TMC) cable channel aired “A Face in the Crowd” repeatedly during the 2016 presidential primaries and campaign. Evidently, the folks at TMC felt there were more than a few parallels between Lonesome Rhodes and candidate Donald Trump’s blustering brand of populism.

In 2019, Criterion released “A Face in the Crowd” on Blu-ray as part of its collection of distinguished films (joining Kazan’s “On the Waterfront”). Regrettably, a commentary from a film critic/historian was not included.

Trivia alert: Kazan filmed the opening scenes of “A Face in the Crowd” in Piggott, Arkansas. As in most of Kazan’s later films, many non-actor locals were used in small parts and as extras. The house with the swimming pool was the home of businessman, Karl Pfeiffer, who often entertained his sister and her husband, Ernest Hemingway, poolside.

Additional thoughts from a believer

With “A Face in a Crowd” Kazan and Schulberg warn of the burgeoning influence of television and right-wing manipulation via media demagogues. Sixty-four-years later, we’ve witnessed both ends of the political spectrum attempting to sway public opinion through the medium, but the reality is that the Left has actually become much more adroit at media manipulation than the Right.

So, then, what is our bottom line? Marxist and atheist Kazan saw society in terms of a battle between Left and Right, in which the Right had to be defeated in order for society to advance. But are political solutions the answer to man’s overarching problems? Is either the Right or the Left capable of ushering in a “Great Society” of peace and prosperity for all?

As believers, our hope is in our Savior and Lord, Jesus Christ, and we anticipate His coming Kingdom. The political ebbs and flows of this fallen world may affect us to varying degrees, but our focus is always on our Heavenly King as we endeavor to fulfill our mission as His ambassadors and emissaries on our brief journey through this world.

Next up: Kazan’s fourteenth film, “Wild River” (1960)

20 thoughts on “Kazan Redux: Elia Kazan’s Thirteenth Film: “A Face in the Crowd”

  1. Think I was so exhausted with ministry I fell asleep at 10:30 PM on the couch reading; think my body was tired from this week and last week! Will read this after my homeschool lessons

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Excellent comments as they are spot-on, Tom. As I like most of Kazan’s films (but didn’t like him), I definitely need to see this.

    I really like Patricia Neal who is in two movies I have at thome: “The Day the Earth Stood Still,” and “Hud.” She won the Best Actress Oscar for “Hud,” to this day still the least amount of screen time ever for actress who won this award. She should have won Supporting Actress instead.

    Anyway, will be looking for “A Face in the Crowd”! Thanks!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. David, thanks for all the good comments! I think you would really enjoy “A Face in the Crowd.” Patricia Neal is excellent. Her character is so thrilled to discover unique talent Rhodes only to watch him gradually turn into a monster. Andy Griffith is outstanding. The ending falls a little flat, but given the other 95%, that’s OK.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. I’m somewhat surprised always to read of Kazan’s films from you and to see how relevant some of his topics are and the political nature of his film and concerns and also social critiques. Good additional believers insight. I can definitely see TMC see this film as a subtle political tale for politics last year, etc. I also think we also have seen news this week of elected officials voicing what they really believe and getting heat from it like the school board with the mike on in Northern california who all resigned, etc.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks! Kazan’s film’s were interesting with their merciless critiques of society. This particular film was decades ahead of its time with its foresight into politics via television. Such an interesting and quirky topic but 1957 audiences weren’t ready for it.
      I googled the story about the school board. Another case of a live mike coming back to bite!

      Liked by 1 person

    1. 👍🏻
      Raining in LA?
      I see LA’s average annual rainfall is 15″ while ROC’s is 33″. Hey, that’s not such a big difference. Whoops! I forgot about ROC’s 80″ of snow every year!
      As you previously mentioned, ROC has the most cloudy days/year, 304. LA? Only 73 cloudy days. Wow! That’s way too much sunshine. We hardly ever have to use sunscreen here in ROC. 😎

      Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you, Crissy! Kazan, an atheist and Marxist, loved to point out the foibles and hypocrisies of America/Western society in his movies, but was also amazingly forthright in revealing his own failings/sins in his autobiography. He was trying to make sense of the world and life without God. His friendly testimony before Congress during the “Red Scare” made him one of the most hated persons in America.
      It just occurred to me that Australia is part of Western society even though you guys are far to the East.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s