Contending for the Gospel (in an era when MOST Christians would rather “get along” with false teachers than contend with them)

Contending for the Gospel: For the Glory of Christ and the Sanctity of His Church
By Mike Gendron
Proclaiming the Gospel, 2019, 288 pp.

5 Stars

In this recently published book, evangelist Mike Gendron compares the genuine Gospel of salvation by God’s grace alone, through faith alone, in Jesus Christ alone with Roman Catholicism’s false gospel of sacramental grace and merit. Gendron leads a Gospel outreach ministry to Roman Catholics called Proclaiming the Gospel (see here). While this book is not as well-structured as “The Gospel According to Rome” by James. G. McCarthy (see here), it is still, overall, a very good analysis of the irreconcilable theological differences between the Gospel of grace and Rome’s false gospel of sacramental grace and merit. In this book, Gendron also addresses the accommodation, compromise, and betrayal of the Gospel by ecumenical “evangelical” Judases who eagerly accommodate and embrace Rome and its false gospel.

Chapters are as follows:

  1. The Foundation for the Gospel
  2. The Message of the Gospel
  3. The Person of the Gospel
  4. The Exclusivity of the Gospel
  5. The Promise of the Gospel
  6. The Compromise of the Gospel
  7. The Opposition to the Gospel
  8. The Departure from the Gospel
  9. The Catholic church and the Gospel
  10. The Urgency of the Gospel
  11. The Proclamation of the Gospel
  12. The Response to the Gospel

I’m very grateful for this new book and for Mike Gendron and his ministry to Roman Catholics. However, I do have a few minor qualifications: 1) As in the later editions of Gendron’s previous book, “Preparing for Eternity,” there’s nothing in the title or the cover graphics of this new book that would indicate that it’s a rebuttal of Rome’s false gospel. That’s obviously by design, but I’m not in favor of that kind of roundabout stratagem. 2) Gendron warns his readers to be cautious of Roman influences seeping into the evangelical church, yet favorably quotes A. W. Tozer on multiple pages. Huh? It was Tozer who introduced Catholic mysticism into the modern evangelical church, and now hipster, mega-church pastors are offering “contemplative, centering prayer” and “spiritual direction” classes to their congregations. In a book that warns about accommodation with Rome, why was Tozer chosen as an oft-cited favorable reference? Gendron should know better. 3) As in other materials I’ve read from Gendron, he scolds those who exhort lost souls to “accept” Jesus as their Savior, something that I do quite regularly. He objects to the word because he sees it as promoting Arminian free-will. However, it’s abundantly clear from Scripture that in order to appropriate the free gift of salvation in Christ Jesus, a person MUST receive/accept it!!! Check your concordance. Receiving/accepting (Greek, λαμβάνω, lambánō) Christ is a thoroughly Biblical doctrine.

“I have come in my Father’s name, and you do not accept (lambánō) me; but if someone else comes in his own name, you will accept him.” – John 5:43 (NIV)

“But to all who did receive (lambánō) him, who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God.” – John 1:12 (ESV)

Gendron admonishes his readers to use only “believe in Christ” in Gospel outreach, but I don’t choose to use “believe” because every Catholic argues that they certainly “believe” in Jesus. An argument over this kind of tertiary preference doesn’t belong in a book like this.

Those minor qualifications aside, this is an excellent book that would benefit both Roman Catholics who are curious about Gospel Christianity and believers who are interested to know the basics of Rome’s false gospel. Mike Gendron is generally not well-received within today’s mega-church “evangelicalism” where pastors would rather teach theological cotton candy than warn and equip the sheep regarding false teachers and false gospels. Order from Amazon here.

41 thoughts on “Contending for the Gospel (in an era when MOST Christians would rather “get along” with false teachers than contend with them)

      1. RE: distracted while walking

        I normally walk with our dog and that’s always a bit of a distraction, but sometimes my wife joins us and then it becomes a three-ring-circus traveling down the road!

        Liked by 1 person

      2. When I’m walking the dog, the dog goes nuts whenever a car passes and tries to attack it. It takes everything I have to hold her back with the leash. When my wife walks with us it just adds to the chaos because she’ll just walk into the mix when I need all the room I can get.

        Liked by 1 person

      3. Several cars can be counted on to pass by whenever we walk and it’s always hyper-dramatic. Yesterday, I did good by waiting for things to calm down after a car went by and patiently asking my wife to just stop walking when a car approaches. I’m prone to lash out impatiently when stressed. Maybe those sermons on marriage are sinking in a little!

        Liked by 1 person

  1. Wow didn’t know that about Towzer and was about to read more from him. People were really recommending him to me this past year. Concerning exhorting people to believe I think it’s biblical and Calvinistic and Spurgeon was a good example of it

    Liked by 2 people

    1. If you google “A.W. Tozer Catholic mysticism” you’ll see a slew of references. He was enamored with the medieval Catholic mystics. In your last sentence, did you mean to write “accept” rather than “believe”?

      Liked by 2 people

    1. Thanks, Hope. I had no idea about Tozer myself until this past October when I wrote a post about how Alistair Begg had favorably cited the writings of Catholic cleric, brother Lawrence, to his congregation. Doing some research, I found out that Tozer was also a big fan of brother Lawrence (which may have influenced Begg), and that he was also a fan of the medieval Catholic mystics and made it a point to favorably refer to them to his audiences.

      Liked by 2 people

    1. I had no idea about Tozer myself, Crissy, until this past October when I wrote a post about how Alistair Begg had favorably cited the writings of Catholic cleric, brother Lawrence, to his congregation. While doing some research on the sad Begg-Lawrence situation, I found out that Tozer was also a big fan of brother Lawrence (which possibly may have influenced Begg), and that he was also a fan of the medieval Catholic mystics. He made it a point to favorably refer to the Catholic mystics in his writings and I imagine in his sermons as well. A google search using “Tozer Catholic mysticism” brings up many relevant articles.

      Liked by 2 people

  2. Discernment is SO EXTREMELY important! Thank you for this post, Tom!
    A lot of these pastors start out very well meaning -then get sucked into things that sound good-tickle the itchy ears!

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Thanks, Beth. Yes, discernment is so important in this current era with so many pastors afraid to say anything “negative” because that’s not part of the church-growth marketing model.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Exactly! The Gospel that they are to spread/share/teach is not about them, or us! It’s about Jesus and His finished work for us so that we can have a relationship with God 🙏🏻

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s