Lent is no match for Super Rodent!

Most of the topics I write about on this blog are serious matters involving spiritual life and death, but there are occasions when I come across something that can only be categorized as sadly comical. Case in point:

This year, the Catholic church’s Lenten season runs from Wednesday, February 14th to Thursday, March 29th and Catholics are strictly forbidden from eating meat on all six of the Fridays during that span under the threat of committing mortal sin, which they are told will doom them to hell. But getting down to the nuts and bolts of what actually constitutes “meat” can get a little tricky as I alluded to in the infamous Chicken in a Biskit post (see here.)

Well, now we have another very strange twist to this rule regarding abstention from meat during Lent.

A few days ago, I was listening to the 2/21/18 podcast of the “Called to Communion” Catholic talk radio show. Moderator, Tom Price, and host, David Anders, were discussing Lenten abstinence restrictions and Anders unflinchingly mentioned that Venezuelan Catholics are allowed to eat the meat of a capybara on Fridays. Capybara? What’s that? Well, it turns out that capybara (photo above) are the largest living rodent in the world, ranging anywhere from 80 to 150 pounds full grown and they like to hang out near or in water. They are a dietary staple of Central America and some say they taste like pork with a slightly fishy accent. As the tale goes, Padre Sojo, Venezuela’s most influential Catholic cleric at the time, traveled to Rome in 1794 and petitioned pope Leo XII to allow his countrymen to eat the meat of the capybara during Lent because, he argued, the animal spent so much time in the water that it was more like a fish than a warm-blooded mammal. Remember, fish are okay to eat on Fridays during Lent, but not the meat from mammals or birds. Sojo’s absurd argument evidently made an impression on the credulous pope because he granted his request and actually issued a Papal Bull decreeing that Venezuelans were free to eat capybara during Lent without incurring a mortal sin.

So Venezuelan Catholics can gorge themselves on capybara burgers on Lenten Fridays with an absolutely clear conscience, but if an American Catholic takes even one bite of a Big Mac, they are doomed to Hell forever!

But this sinner who was freed from the chains of Catholicism and is saved by the grace of God through faith in Jesus Christ alone has a hypothetical question for my Catholic friends. Let’s suppose an American Catholic travels down to Venezuela on business during Lent. He’s walking the streets of Caracas on a Friday at noon and smells the wonderful aroma of barbecue in the air. In a few minutes, he discovers the source of the olfactory bliss; a sidewalk food vendor who beckons him over to try some of his smokey barbecued capybara. The American, mouth watering, declines with noticeable regret, saying in broken Spanish that he is prohibited from eating meat on Friday during Lent. But the vendor reassures him that the pope himself declared it was okay to eat capybara in Venezuela during Lent and another native walking by confirms the information. The American then hungrily orders a double-plateful of barbecued capybara and eats his fill. The next day, the American begins his journey back to the U.S., but his plane crashes and all aboard perish. Which now brings us to our question: Did the American Catholic go to hell for eating capybara on a Lenten Friday because he was still under the jurisdiction of his American bishop or did Leo XII’s papal bull cover all the bases?

Catholic friend, if you ever get tired of spinning in Catholicism’s legalistic hamster (another rodent) wheel, turn to Jesus Christ. Repent of your sins and ask Jesus Christ to save you by faith in Him alone.

Is Catholicism a false religion? Are Catholics saved?

Postscript: Some may object to my interjection of humor in this discussion, but folks, seriously, I couldn’t have come up with this “capybara dispensation” in my wildest dreams.

23 thoughts on “Lent is no match for Super Rodent!

  1. No, the American would not have gone to hell for that act of eating rodent in Venezuela on Friday in Lent. Your writing is entertaining sometimes because you make outrageous claims which do not receive the due diligence of reasoning. Sin is not all or nothing as pertains to culpability: there is most often a mitigating circumstance.


    1. Thanks, Francis. As you demonstrate, a Catholic can look at this capybara situation and say, what’s the big deal, that’s just par for the course. You’re so conditioned by your religious hamster wheel that you don’t see anything strange about a very strange (and un-Biblical) situation. In Catholicism, there’s always a boatload of “mitigating circumstances” involving whether such and such are actually sins or not, requiring a stable of canon lawyers who still can’t sort it out all the way to the end of the rabbit hole. Such is the futility of works righteousness.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. I think that you should turn back to Sacred Scripture and read the Gospels to remember who the Lord is and what power He have to Peter and his successors. It’s easy to do, with faith.


      2. Radio priest, Rick Poblocki, says traveling Catholics are subject to the guidelines their home bishop imposes, but you contradict that. Who is right, you or Poblocki? Catholicism is often a matter of which authority you consult.


      3. I don’t think so. Your church says all of its members who defiantly eat what it defines as “meat” this coming Friday are going to hell unless they have a dispensation like with this capybara, etc., etc.


      4. Defiance is an indication of a soul with hatred for God. People are allowed to hate God and, in doing so, send themselves to hell where they don’t have to live God.


      5. I don’t understand where you going with all of this in relation to eating “meat” on Lenten Friday. Is defiantly eating a cheeseburger on Lenten Friday a mortal sin that will doom a person to hell or not? And does an American Catholic who eats capybara while visiting in Venezuela commit a mortal sin or not? You say no but priest Poblocki says yes. Please explain. Most of what you wrote is Jesuitical equivocation.


      6. Well, it is not an intrinsically evil act to eat meat, so eating meat does not send a person to hell. If a competent Catholic person eats meat on Friday for the direct purpose of defying Church law (grave matter and clear intention), knowing that it is considered mortally sinful to do so (full knowledge), then it is probable that this person chose to hate God before he ate the meat. So, truly, if a person hates God, why would God send this person to heaven to be with Him who he hates? He gives us free will: “If you hate Me, you are free to leave heaven forever, but I hope you will repent and decide to love Me instead.”


      7. Francis, once again, we’re going round and round. I really have no interest in engaging you in your Jesuitical casuistry. Have a nice day.


  2. That creature looks like a beaver. The whole thing by the Paptists is “fishy” to me…but I say a hearty amen to this: “Catholic friend, if you ever get tired of spinning in Catholicism’s legalistic hamster (another rodent) wheel, turn to Jesus Christ. Repent of your sins and ask Jesus Christ to save you by faith in Him alone.”

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s