The most hated man in Hollywood

The Ambivalent Legacy of Elia Kazan: The Politics of the Post-HUAC Filmsek
By Ron Briley
Rowman & Littlefield, 2016, 241 pages

Film director, Elia Kazan, was subpoenaed to appear before the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) in 1952 at the height of the “Red Scare” to testify about his involvement with the Communist Party of the USA (CPUSA) in the 1930s. At the time he was summoned, Kazan was widely recognized as the premier director in Hollywood AND on Broadway. If he refused to cooperate with the committee, the movie studios would immediately blacklist him, as they had with many others.

Kazan had quit the CPUSA in 1936, fed up with its strong-arm tactics, but he remained a Marxist his entire life. Many American communists and their fellow-travelers were appalled by Stalin’s nonaggression pact with Hitler in 1939 and his totalitarian methods but more than a few agreed with the Soviet dictator that “you can’t make an omelette without breaking eggs.” The consensus among Hollywood liberals was to close ranks and oppose the conservative “witch hunt,” even if it meant losing employment.

Kazan finally agreed to cooperate with the committee and he named the names of communists that he personally knew. He argued that all Americans should oppose the Soviet-controlled CPUSA. Others in Hollywood had cooperated with the committee, but Kazan was the biggest name. After testifying, he became an absolute pariah among the entertainment industry’s liberals. He lost most of his friends and many in Hollywood and Broadway refused to work with him. The decision on whether he should testify or not was a lose-lose proposition for Kazan and one of the great personal dramas of the period.

In this interesting book, Briley examines the twelve films Kazan made following his testimony. The first three movies are thinly veiled critiques of Stalinism and serve as self-justification for his testimony, but in his final nine films, Kazan would continue to attack American capitalism and materialism, thereby defending his status as a political progressive despite his cooperation with HUAC.

Every person holds to some kind of “worldview.” Kazan was a Marxist and an atheist and believed exclusively in human solutions to human problems. I enjoy reading about Kazan and watching his films, some are real gems, but I’m also saddened for those who hold to such a Christ-less view of life and the world. I’ll be reviewing Kazan’s first film, “A Tree Grows in Brooklyn” (1945), later this week.

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “The most hated man in Hollywood

    1. Thanks, Jim. I became familiar with Kazan towards the end of his career in the early 70s. An amazing story. In the late 40s and early 50s he was the toast of both coasts but after his testimony he was viewed as a “rat fink” Benedict Arnold by the Left for 50 years. He said old friends and acquaintances crossed to the other side of the streets of New York City rather than to have to interact with him, as if he had a contagious disease. He wrote that he ignored the contempt and embraced the role of being an outsider but I’m sure it was very painful. I’m reminded by this that the Lord died for us “while we were yet sinners” and shows us love, forgiveness, and mercy even though we deserve none of it.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s