You’ll never see McDonald’s invite Burger King execs to one of their board meetings, but evangelicals can’t seem to muster at least the same level of fidelity to the Gospel of grace.

Several months ago, I wrote a post regarding one of the strangest books I have ever read in my entire life. InGeis “Roman Catholics and Evangelicals: Agreements and Differences” (1995), evangelical theologian, Norman Geisler, examined the many doctrines that separate evangelicals and Roman Catholics. Most importantly, Geisler noted that Catholicism’s gospel of salvation through sacramental grace and merit was not in accord with the biblical Gospel of salvation by God’s grace through faith in Jesus Christ alone. Nevertheless, Geisler still somehow concluded that Catholicism is a Christian entity. Huh? It was like a courtroom prosecutor concluding his presentation by ripping up his water-tight evidence and turning to the judge and asking that the case against the guilty defendant be dismissed. Needless to say, ecumenists loved Geisler’s book. See my review here.

I’ve come across Geisler’s name several times recently. While he’s certainly not a household name, Professor Geisler is esteemed in evangelical academic circles as one of their most respected theologians and philosophers. I’ve learned that several of evangelicalism’s most popular apologists were mentored by Geisler; men like Ravi Zacharias, William Lane Craig, and Lee Strobel. Ahhh. Now I get it! The apple never falls too far from the tree. I’ve mentioned Zacharias’s ecumenical leanings here. I’ve also read a couple of offerings from Strobel’s best-selling “The Case for…” series, but I jumped off that assembly line, never to return, after he cited Roman Catholics, Mother Teresa, Pope John Paul II, G.K. Chesterton, and Saint Teresa of Avila as exemplary Christians in “The Case for Faith.”

While searching on Amazon the other night, I came across a book titled, “Why I Am A Christian: Leading Thinkers Explain Why They Believe” (2001) (see photo), which was edited by Geisler. Among others, contributors include Zacharias, Craig, and Roman Catholic philosopher, Peter Kreeft. Kreeft, a convert to Catholicism from the Dutch Reformed Church, is definitely one of Rome’s most prolific champions. He has authored many books which proclaim and defend Rome’s gospel of sacramental grace and merit. Isn’t it strange that a Catholic philosopher would be invited to contribute to a book devoted to evangelical apologetics? Not if the editor is Norman Geisler. Imagine Catholicism’s EWTN or Ignatius Press inviting John MacArthur or R.C. Sproul to contribute to a book on Catholic apologetics! Oy vey! The concept is laughable from either side. But accommodators like Geisler would much rather err on the side of “Christian unity” than be known as – heaven forbid – “uncharitable” Protestant sectarians.

Kreeft’s gospel of sacramental grace and merit is NOT the Gospel of grace by faith. Including Kreeft in “Why I Am A Christtian” blurs the Gospel just like Peter’s accommodation of the legalistic judaizers in Antioch.

“But when Cephas came to Antioch, I opposed him to his face, because he stood condemned. For before certain men came from James, he was eating with the Gentiles; but when they came he drew back and separated himself, fearing the circumcision party. And the rest of the Jews acted hypocritically along with him, so that even Barnabas was led astray by their hypocrisy. But when I saw that their conduct was not in step with the truth of the gospel, I said to Cephas before them all, “If you, though a Jew, live like a Gentile and not like a Jew, how can you force the Gentiles to live like Jews?” – Galatians 2:11-14


3 thoughts on “You’ll never see McDonald’s invite Burger King execs to one of their board meetings, but evangelicals can’t seem to muster at least the same level of fidelity to the Gospel of grace.

  1. More and more I have found a love for studying other traditions within Christianity. It is almost like the gospels in a sense.

    The gospels and epistles highlight different things and provide a fullness to the witness to the Lord and our God Jesus.

    The true Truth is not propositional it is Alive, Transcendent yet imminent, Dynamic, and Transformative in ways mortal men and woman will never be able to fully comprehend.

    I think more and more we that profess Christianity as our faith should pray to be as the Apostles, not weak in our Orthodox standings but to be as they where One in the witness and communion and to understand that God reveals his fullness not simply in one letter or through one person but through Christ and his Spirit.


  2. That is a very good illustration of McDonalds and Burger King. For the record I don’t know what’s evangelical infatuation with Kreeft. His philosophy isn’t that profound–let alone biblical and Gospel considerations.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks, Jim. I’m glad someone appreciated my Mickey D-BK metaphor! 🙂 I haven’t read any of Kreeft’s books to date but I know several are unabashed RC apologias, the kind of stuff EWTN would carry. I may read his “Ecumenical Jihad” just because I know it reflects the Vatican’s view on ecumenism. And I see it was published by Ignatius Press which is more Catholic than the pope. The pastor of the SBC church we used to attend quoted Kreeft from the pulpit one Sunday as one of his “favorite philosophers.” I knew I was definitely in the wrong place.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s